Taking the measure of human learning - Locally constructed tests


Ed 510 Applications of Educational Research
 



 
 
Here are some terms that help you understand the material in this course.  Define them and create examples for each. 
 
  • Affective knowledge 
  • Cognitive knowledge 
  • Curricular decisions 
  • Instructional decisions 
  • Item format
  • Levels of knowledge 
  • Locally constructed tests 
  • Placement decisions 
  • Psychomotor knowledge 
  • Screening decisions 
  • Selection decisions 
  • Test construction 
  • Test blue print (also item specification table) 
  • Test objectives 
 

 

Introduction
 

Collecting the information to answer the research question (s) is often accomplished through the use of tests. This section explores the purposes of local tests (designed by teachers and other educators) and the strategies used to create them.
Other kinds of tools are also used to collect research data. These include checklists, surveys and questionnaires, observation formats and protocols, structured interviews. All of these techniques are designed for local educational purposes as well as for the purpose of answering research questions   Even these approaches to data collection follow design strategies that are similar to the principles used to design tests.
Tests are used for a variety of purposes, mostly related to making decisions. There are several types of decisions made by tests:
Three essential steps in the development of tests
  The planning stage
 
 
Determining test objectives 

Objectives should be stated 

  • in terms of behavior
  • using an active verb
  • in terms of behaviors that are observable
  • precisely
  • as a unitary goal (refer to one and only one intended behavior)
  • in terms of outcomes that are linked to the purpose of the test
  • with an appropriate level of generality
  • in terms of the level of performance or time required
Determining test content 
  • When content is specified for a test one needs to consider both information that pertains to an area to be test, but also to types of knowledge that might be important to the assessment 
  • Types of knowledge may be cognitive, affective or psychomotor 
  • Cognitive knowledge includes - Remembered material, the ability to operate on that material, the ability to apply and use material and the ability to evaluate information and to solve problems. Often these abilities are represented as levels of knowledge 
     
    • Information 
    • Concepts, principles and theories 
    • Analysis 
    • Synthesis 
    • Application 
    • Problem Solving 
    • Evaluation 
    Affective knowledge includes - Awareness of emotional content in experience, awareness of the emotional reactions of others, perspective taking, empathy, values and valuing, collaborative ability, just to name a few dimensions of affective knowing. 
  • Psychomotor knowledge includes - Sensory and motor abilities that in general permit individuals to assimilate sensory information and coordinate it. More than one perceptual system may be involved. Thus psychomotor knowledge refers to the ability to assimilate and integrate visual, auditory, tactile, kinesthetic, olfactory, gustatory and proxemic information. It also refers to the ability to coordinate information across these important sensory systems (e.g., visual motor coordination)

Pulling purposes, objectives, content and test procedures together
 

A well constructed local test is usually developed from a test blueprint. This is a diagram or chart that first of all integrates objectives and content. After these two components of the plan are pulled together, then it is possible to decide on procedure by deciding on the types of items that will be used.


Creating a test blueprint
 

In the following example a researcher wishes to construct a local test that can be used to evaluate a leadership training course. The course was delivered workshop style. Thus candidates for the principals certificate were exposed to theoretical knowledge about leadership, management, human motivation, social learning and learning in organizations. The researcher determines that her purpose is to see whether the outcomes of instruction have been met by the candidates. She begins by deciding how workshop objectives (that represent the outcomes of instruction) can be matched to the content covered in the workshop itself.
A table is created that lists objectives vertically and content horizontally, like so:
Content Knowledge of human motivation Social learning Organizational learning Management practices  Leadership theory
Objective          
Recognizes key principles          
Idenntifies key terms and ideas          
Makes inferences based on situational problems          
Evaluates problems in context          
Transfers skills to novel problems           

 

In this table the researcher has integrated content (knowledge about leadership) with objectives that were part of a leadership training course. The next step will be to decide on item formats that will assess knowledge strategically.
 

Deciding on procedures

The types of items that are used in a test must be matched to the knowledge that is going to be assessed. Thus items used to assess whether an examinee can identify key terminology may look different from items used to determine whether the examinee can transfer skills to novel problems.

 
When you want to assess The consider the following item format
Recognition of facts, definitions, memory Multiple choice 

Matching 

Short answer 

True/False

Discrimination Multiple choice 

Matching

Generalization Multiple choice
Inference Multiple choice 
Analysis Multiple choice
Evaluation Multiple choice
Application Multiple choice 

Short essay

Problem solving Multiple choice 

Short essay

Transfer of training Multiple choice 

Performance tests 

Short essay

Most affective outcomes Short essays 

or consider using alternatives to tests.

Psychomotor outcomes Performance tests

Summarizing questions
 

Why do you think the multiple choice item format is repeated so frequently in the table above?
 

Why is the true/false item format listed only once?
 

What trade off's based on the efficiency of testing might be present. That is, why are some items listed less than others? Does it have something to do with the amount of information that can be gained from an item in relation to the number of items that can be included on an examination?
 
 

return to the course schedule

Page created January 5, 2001.  Copyright Antonia D'Onofrio 2001/2002/2003.