Taking the measure
of human learning - Locally constructed tests
Ed 510
Applications of Educational Research
Here
are some terms that help you understand the material in this course.
Define them and create examples for each.
-
Affective knowledge
-
Cognitive knowledge
-
Curricular decisions
-
Instructional
decisions
-
Item format
-
Levels of knowledge
-
Locally constructed
tests
-
Placement decisions
-
Psychomotor knowledge
-
Screening decisions
-
Selection decisions
-
Test construction
-
Test blue print
(also item specification table)
-
Test objectives
|
Introduction
-
Collecting the
information to answer the research question (s) is often accomplished through
the use of tests. This section explores the purposes of local tests (designed
by teachers and other educators) and the strategies used to create them.
-
Other kinds of
tools are also used to collect research data. These include checklists,
surveys and questionnaires, observation formats and protocols, structured
interviews. All of these techniques are designed for local educational
purposes as well as for the purpose of answering research questions
Even these approaches to data collection follow design strategies that
are similar to the principles used to design tests.
-
Tests are used
for a variety of purposes, mostly related to making decisions. There are
several types of decisions made by tests:
-
Instructional
- to decide whether the goals and objectives of instruction have been met.
-
Curricular - to
decide whether the goals and objectives of a program or curriculum have
been effective.
-
Selection - to
identify candidates for programs (for example, law school admissions tests).
-
Placement- to
identify candidates suited for placement in special programs (for example,
gifted education).
-
Screening - to
distinguish among examinees for special attributes or traits (for example,
engineering aptitude).
-
Program comparison
- to compare two or more programs according to one or more important criteria
(for example, school districts performance on standardized tests of reading).
Three essential
steps in the development of tests
-
Identify and define
the attribute to be measured - What is the construct that represents the
knowledge, behavior, skill, attitude or opinion that will be assessed?
-
Decide on procedures
that will be used to demonstrate the attribute - What will you have the
examinee do in order to demonstrate the construct objectively using a test?
-
Quantify the attribute
- How will you assign values to the performance of examinees on tests?
The planning
stage
-
Planning questions
-
The first concern
of the researcher is to determine the purpose of a test . Then the
researcher must address the following questions.
-
What are the objectives
of instruction are investigated by the instrument?
-
When testing
attitudes and opinions this questions doesn't seem to apply. But there
is a parallel idea that needs to be part of the planning process. E.G.,
what cognitive processes or psychological attributes are to be demonstrated?
-
What is the content
that is to be covered by the test?
-
What type of exercise
(test performance) will indicate that content and objectives can be objectively
demonstrated?
|
Determining
test objectives
Objectives
should be stated
-
in terms of behavior
-
using an active
verb
-
in terms of behaviors
that are observable
-
precisely
-
as a unitary goal
(refer to one and only one intended behavior)
-
in terms of outcomes
that are linked to the purpose of the test
-
with an appropriate
level of generality
-
in terms of the
level of performance or time required
|
Determining
test content
-
When content is
specified for a test one needs to consider both information that pertains
to an area to be test, but also to types of knowledge that might be important
to the assessment
-
Types of knowledge
may be cognitive, affective or psychomotor
-
Cognitive knowledge
includes - Remembered material, the ability to operate on that material,
the ability to apply and use material and the ability to evaluate information
and to solve problems. Often these abilities are represented as levels
of knowledge
-
Information
-
Concepts, principles
and theories
-
Analysis
-
Synthesis
-
Application
-
Problem Solving
-
Evaluation
Affective
knowledge includes - Awareness of emotional content in experience, awareness
of the emotional reactions of others, perspective taking, empathy, values
and valuing, collaborative ability, just to name a few dimensions of affective
knowing.
-
Psychomotor knowledge
includes - Sensory and motor abilities that in general permit individuals
to assimilate sensory information and coordinate it. More than one perceptual
system may be involved. Thus psychomotor knowledge refers to the ability
to assimilate and integrate visual, auditory, tactile, kinesthetic, olfactory,
gustatory and proxemic information. It also refers to the ability to coordinate
information across these important sensory systems (e.g., visual motor
coordination)
|
Pulling
purposes, objectives, content and test procedures together
-
A well constructed
local test is usually developed from a test blueprint. This is a diagram
or chart that first of all integrates objectives and content. After these
two components of the plan are pulled together, then it is possible to
decide on procedure by deciding on the types of items that will be used.
-
Creating
a test blueprint
-
In the following
example a researcher wishes to construct a local test that can be used
to evaluate a leadership training course. The course was delivered workshop
style. Thus candidates for the principals certificate were exposed to theoretical
knowledge about leadership, management, human motivation, social learning
and learning in organizations. The researcher determines that her purpose
is to see whether the outcomes of instruction have been met by the candidates.
She begins by deciding how workshop objectives (that represent the outcomes
of instruction) can be matched to the content covered in the workshop itself.
-
A table is created
that lists objectives vertically and content horizontally, like so:
-
| Content |
Knowledge
of human motivation |
Social
learning |
Organizational
learning |
Management
practices |
Leadership
theory |
| Objective |
|
|
|
|
|
| Recognizes
key principles |
|
|
|
|
|
| Idenntifies
key terms and ideas |
|
|
|
|
|
| Makes inferences
based on situational problems |
|
|
|
|
|
| Evaluates
problems in context |
|
|
|
|
|
| Transfers
skills to novel problems |
|
|
|
|
|
In this table
the researcher has integrated content (knowledge about leadership) with
objectives that were part of a leadership training course. The next step
will be to decide on item formats that will assess knowledge strategically.
Deciding
on procedures
-
The types of items
that are used in a test must be matched to the knowledge that is going
to be assessed. Thus items used to assess whether an examinee can identify
key terminology may look different from items used to determine whether
the examinee can transfer skills to novel problems.
| When
you want to assess |
The
consider the following item format |
| Recognition
of facts, definitions, memory |
Multiple choice
Matching
Short answer
True/False |
| Discrimination |
Multiple choice
Matching |
| Generalization |
Multiple choice |
| Inference |
Multiple choice |
| Analysis |
Multiple choice |
| Evaluation |
Multiple choice |
| Application |
Multiple choice
Short essay |
| Problem solving |
Multiple choice
Short essay |
| Transfer of
training |
Multiple choice
Performance
tests
Short essay |
| Most affective
outcomes |
Short essays
or consider
using alternatives to tests. |
| Psychomotor
outcomes |
Performance
tests |
Summarizing
questions
Why do you
think the multiple choice item format is repeated so frequently in the
table above?
Why is the
true/false item format listed only once?
What trade
off's based on the efficiency of testing might be present. That is, why
are some items listed less than others? Does it have something to do with
the amount of information that can be gained from an item in relation to
the number of items that can be included on an examination?
return
to the course schedule
Page created
January 5, 2001. Copyright Antonia D'Onofrio 2001/2002/2003.